The Glorious Hope of Isaiah (#11: The Nations)

By | February 12, 2009

What I am about to say next may shock you.  The key to enjoying Isaiah 13-23 is to read fast.  My point is not that this section was not important when Isaiah delivered it, nor would I argue that there are not good, helpful truths in it today.  I do believe that “all Scripture is inspired and useful….”  But given the feebleness of our minds and the limitedness of our attention spans and the distance between our world and Isaiah’s, I suggest that you almost skip this section when you study or teach through Isaiah.

Here’s an outline to show you what you ‘re missing:

  • The Lord announces his plans for Babylon (13:1–14:23)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Assyria (14:23-27)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Philistia (14:28-32)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Moab (15:1–16:14)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Damascus (17:1-14)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Cush (18:1-7)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Egypt (19:1–20:6)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Babylon (21:1-10)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Dumah (21:11-12)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Arabia (21:13-17)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Jerusalem (22:1-25)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Tyre (23:1-18)

Given that you don’t live in any of those places (or more properly, belong to any of those people), and given that most of these plans have already transpired, and given that the Bible is so huge that you ‘ll never know it all anyway, I think I can safely suggest that your first time through, you need not get hung up here.  Indeed, that, I fear, is a problem too real for too many.  They get bogged down and, unlike when they ‘re playing cars and run into a muddle puddle, they never just pick the car up and plop it down on the other side and keep going.

What is the larger point of this section?  I think it can be summed up this way: by announcing his plans (judgment) on the other nations, the Lord is demonstrating his sovereignty over them.  The God of Israel is also the God of Babylon (not Marduk).  Ok, you say, couldn’t he just say that and move on?  I think that God had more in mind.  He wanted to display to the world that he could do what their gods could not.  As he says in a challenge to the gods:

Isaiah 41:23 (ESV) “Tell us what is to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods; do good, or do harm, that we may be dismayed and terrified.”

The oracles of chapters 13-23 do not describe the sins of the nations.  You might expect that they would.  But they instead declare God’s judgment against them with much detail.  He tells the nations what will happen before it happens so that they will know the Lord is God. 

Ho, hum, you’ve heard this before, right?  Wait and consider the time in which Isaiah spoke.  Isaiah has already prophesied that Assyria would invade and destroy Israel.  Shortly he will predict that Babylon will carry off the treasures and princes of Judah (Isa 39).  The Philistines and the Moabites and the rest would either take advantage of Israel’s judgment or gloat in her downfall, and all would be tempted to conclude that the weakest god of all was the god of Israel.

God really had himself in a bind.  On the one hand, he was duty-bound to punish Israel for her covenant violations.  If he did not, he would be a faithless God.  On the other hand, if he had Israel carried off into exile as he had threatened, then it would appear that he was a lesser god than Marduk and Dagon and Chemosh and the rest.  How did God get out of this bind?  Isaiah to the rescue!  Through this prophet (and others), the Lord made it clear that his sovereignty was not impugned by Israel’s exile.  In fact, the most glorious passages of the Lord’s sovereign control over the world and history are probably in Isaiah.

Now all of this, quite frankly, is off our topic of the thread of messianic hope.  But I’ve already repeatedly made a point in this series that is relevant here.  Throughout this section, as in chapters 1-12, the bulk of the message is dark judgment, but the prophet intersperses some glimmers of hope.  I include just a couple here to warm your heart. 

Isaiah 16:4b-5 (ESV) “When the oppressor is no more, and destruction has ceased, and he who tramples underfoot has vanished from the land, 5 then a throne will be established in steadfast love, and on it will sit in faithfulness in the tent of David one who judges and seeks justice and is swift to do righteousness.””

Isaiah 17:7-8 (ESV) “In that day man will look to his Maker, and his eyes will look on the Holy One of Israel. 8 He will not look to the altars, the work of his hands, and he will not look on what his own fingers have made, either the Asherim or the altars of incense.”

Now having said that, I realize another reality: if you just read these verses above, out of context as they are, your heart may not be warmed.  But if you are an Israelite and you ‘re listening to these messages of doom and then you hear these verses, I think your spirit soars.  So maybe I was wrong after all.  Read chapters 13-23.  But don’t try to figure everything out.  Instead keep your highlighter handy for the iron-clad promises of hope that God made to his people. And rejoice that he is Lord of the nations, powerful without limits, righteous without exception, and faithful every time.

5 thoughts on “The Glorious Hope of Isaiah (#11: The Nations)

  1. Karan Brunson

    Thank you for a great overview of tough reading, Todd! Isaiah leaves no question that before God brings the Kingdom He first purifies Israel and judges all Gentile nations.
    Here are some thoughts I have about that judgment: The judgment on Gentile nations (not individual Gentiles) looks to have its basis in the Abrahamic Covenant: “And I will bless those who bless you (Israel), And the one who curses you I will curse.” (Gen 12.3) When the nations are judged at the end of the tribulation for potential entry into the Millennium, the basis again seems to be Abrahamic Covenant. Those people groups that provide food and protection to Israel (Jesus ‘ brethren) when Antichrist is attempting to destroy all Israelites will be the nations that remain on earth for the Millennial part of the Kingdom (Matt 25.31-45). This is a temporal judgment on nations, not an eternal judgment on individuals – since the issue is not response to Christ and His death for sin, but for treatment of Israel. These nations are covenantally righteous in that when Antichrist breaks his covenant with Israel they understand how wrong he is and they step in to protect Israel. Covenantal righteousness may or may not include personal salvation. It is clear there are great numbers of unbelieving Gentiles in the Millennium (Is 60.2 the nations are in darkness). Is it necessary that Gentiles entering the Mill have personal salvation?
    I love being challenged by your insights on Isaiah!

    Reply
  2. Todd Bolen

    Karan – I appreciate your thoughts. You are ahead of me in thinking about these matters. I’ll keep these things in mind as I press on.

    Reply
  3. John Crotts

    Todd–I’ve really appreciated your overview of Isaiah. I’ve been journalling through the book in order to consider it carefully. You’ve had some great observations so far. Keep up the good work!

    One thought I’ve wondered about (based on a previous post) is how you think about NT verses that seem to teach that we are in the kingdom now (like Col 1:13). I certainly get the issues you are bringing up. But I know some dispys that get in as much trouble trying to undo clear NT verses, as you have well pointed out the dangers of doing to Isaiah.

    Blessings! John

    Reply
  4. Todd Bolen

    John – thanks for the encouragement. I’ve thought recently about doing a series on NT verses related to the kingdom that are often misunderstood. If I do that, I’ll certainly stress the need of “bringing” the OT definitions in reading the NT. Another important point is that some things are spoken of in the present tense that must be understood as futuristic present. Everyone agrees that this is one kind of use of the present (John 14:3 – not “I come” but “I will come”; cf. Wallace 535-37); the decision is based on context. Another reality is that sometimes things are spoken of in anticipation. Thus one can be a citizen of the kingdom when that kingdom is still future. One could believe that my interpretations of some of these passages are less than natural; I would argue that they are possible and given the alternative (a denial or redefinition of OT promises) they are best. Col 1:13 can suggest that we are in the kingdom now; it can also be understood as saying that we belong to the kingdom, without indicating that the kingdom is currently established. Perhaps I’ll say much more in the future.

    Reply
  5. Todd Bolen

    I just came across this in studying something else.

    Acts 14:22 (ESV) “strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.”

    This verse doesn’t make sense if Paul believed that believers were already in the kingdom. Rather, our present life will be filled with trials and then we will enter the kingdom.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *