Today I read Judges. I don’t know exactly, but I estimate that I spent about five hours reading through the book (once). It was an exceptional journey. I’ve suggested here before that we need to read more books (and less stories and chapters). Things come to life in a different way if you read the whole book. Stories that don’t seem related actually are. Incidental comments aren’t incidental when you remember what happened six chapters back. You see threads and themes. You see the big picture. It’s a wonderful privilege. If you have a Bible at home, I recommend that you try this. And not just for Philippians, but for Judges or Deuteronomy or Genesis. I could write twenty posts on things I learned and observations I made today.
I can only comment briefly, but here are a few fresh things that come from reading the whole book.
The Ephraimites are jerks. They don’t show up for the battle, but they show up after the victory has been won. And they want the spoils. And if you ‘re not ready to share, they ‘re ready to fight you. This is their character. You see it in both the stories of Gideon (where he is nice) and Jephthah (where he is not).
Leadership is a good thing. The people do well when they have a leader, but as soon as he dies, the people turn wicked again. Judges is an apologetic for the monarchy. Maybe one of the elders who came to Samuel when he was getting old wrote the book. (Not really, but you see my point.)
God put the Levites throughout the land so that they would witness to all the tribes for him. Instead they decided to be entrepreneurs, serving at idolatrous shrines for whoever paid the most.
The Abimelech story sticks out like a sore thumb. Unlike the stories before and after it, there’s no judge, there’s no deliverance from oppression, and there’s no peace. It is the story of a curse fulfilled, of God getting revenge.
If you read the whole book straight through, when you start chapter 20, this verse will blow you out of the water: “Then all the Israelites from Dan to Beersheba and from the land of Gilead came out as one man.”
I have a problem with Jabesh Gilead. If all of the people were killed, why does Saul’s family celebrate Thanksgiving here each year? How does he have family there that he is interested in saving (1 Sam 11) and that later save him (1 Sam 31)?
Judah looks good; Benjamin looks bad. But Benjamin defeats Judah in the first (and maybe second) battles.
The Levite who turned his concubine over to the Benjamites is a wretched man. Why did he ever go to rescue her from dad in the first place? (Don’t try to answer my questions without reading the stories carefully; I’m not putting all of the details into my descriptions or questions.)
Was the tabernacle and ark always at Shiloh? I’ve always thought so. But it doesn’t seem like it in chapters 19-21, especially when we get directions to Shiloh at the end.
So that’s a few thoughts at the end of a long day. I’ve read and taught these stories (most of them) many dozens of times. But this is the first time that I’ve ever carefully read through the whole book. All I did was read the book itself; I didn’t look at study notes or commentaries. Tomorrow I ‘ll do some reading in other books. I may change my mind on some things, I ‘ll certainly gain some understanding in some areas, and I may come up with new questions.
My plea to you is this: find 3 or 4 hours in your life and do this. Pick a book you want to “crack” and just work through it, writing (or typing) notes as you go (I have about 15 pages of typed notes from today). If you aren’t delighted with the results, I ‘ll give you your money back. If you do it and you ‘re inclined to send me an email or comment here, please do. The Bible is a better book than any other you have read, are reading, or will read. It’s worth more than a 10-minute devotional in the morning.
I agree!
Every Wednesday night I walk the Jr. High group through a book of the Bible. So every Wednesday I spend most of the day reading that book, making notes, and looking up anything I don’t understand. I’ve really started looking forward to Wednesdays!
Not only that, but the well-churched missionary kids in the youth group are loving it too. We stopped doing games so I can teach longer, and they keep inviting friends.
I could go on, but I’m going to go read 2 Kings now…
One thing I’ve found helpful in reading a whole book of the Bible is to remove the chapter and verses, which we’ve done with Romans.
It helped me not track how much I’ve read, and just enjoy reading the whole thing as one document and not a bunch of parts stuck together.
Funny you mention reading Judges all the way through–I did this on the plane ride home from Hungary a couple of weeks ago. I also noticed tons of new things. Some of the things you highlighted also jumped out at me (e.g. Abimelech).
Clearly the Ark was NOT at Shiloh the whole time (300 yrs)–look at Judg 20:27 (it’s at Bethel there). I’ve spent the past three hours working on a piece related to the movement of the Ark. I’m considering the possibility that the Ark didn’t stay only at KJ after it came up from Philistia. Interesting stuff!
Benj – there’s a question of how you translate “Bethel” in Judges 20. I’m reluctant to see the tabernacle leaving Shiloh after Joshua 18:1. But perhaps this story, occurring very early in the period of the judges, suggests that it moved in the earliest days. As for the ark, I’m pretty convinced it did not leave Kiriath Jearim until David took it. I have a theory, though, about the travels of the tabernacle during that time.
In regards to a previous post, I decided to study Isaiah this semester, reading five chapters at a time. I’m missing days sometimes, but I’ll read the book six or seven times by the end of the semester, I hope. It’s so cool!
Todd,
Even if you translate “Bethel” as “House of God,” then the text would seem to indicate that God’s house is at Mizpah (Judg 20:1)–although I’m hesitant to agree with Merrill on that interpretation (I think I can make a good case against that reading, even though reading “house of God” would bolster my theory).
You say that you “…[are] pretty convinced it [the ark] did not leave Kiriath Jearim until David took it.”
You make a good point. The fact that you’re “pretty convinced” is a strong argument, but here’s my counter-argument: until Columbus, most people were “pretty convinced” that the earth was flat. :-)
….so I guess that just blows your theory out of the water….(this is an inside joke). :-)
Benj – you can only long for the day when a student tells you that he has just “blown your theory out of the water”!