I became minorly personally involved in this project when an editor asked me for some advice. Later I was given the chance to endorse the Bible (on the basis of materials sent electronically), and it quickly became clear that whatever powers that be had really no idea of my humble status. Yesterday I saw a box for the Bible in the trash at DTS, which alerted me to the fact that the Bible was finally out. I of course pulled the box out of the trash and admired it. When I arrived home from school today, a Bible was waiting for me.
I was first surprised that they (the publisher, Crossway) sent it so fast. It was, after all, a freebie given to those who endorsed the Bible. But they shipped it before it was officially available. That speaks of some measure of hard work and concern. (By contrast, I, ahem, only sent on CDs to those who helped me on the recent Bivin photos project a week after its release.) Of course, they would send a hardcover. That’s what these guys do. They want to minimize their costs as much as possible and they know you can’t complain, because, after all, you didn’t pay for it. But they didn’t send a hardback. Guess which one they sent? No, not the TruTone or the Bonded Leather. Not even the Genuine Leather. They sent the Premium Calfskin Leather, which sells for more than 2x the next most expensive Bible. How do you suppose that that makes someone feel? Do you suppose that it creates deep feelings of gratitude? Do you think it might engender some loyalty? Of course it does. Of course I ‘ll recommend the Bible all over the place. (Case in point is what you ‘re reading right now.) It strikes me as smart. It seems like their investment will repay itself many times over. So why doesn’t everyone do this? Answer: because they think short-range and not long-range. Note that I did not say that they were greedy. I’m not condemning greedy here. I’m just saying that it’s better to be greedy in the long run.
You ‘re interested in more than the sensations that course through my fingertips as I caress the cover, and I’m happy to oblige. Real fast of course, because I’ve only had it a few minutes and I need to do something else.
The first passage I looked up was Romans 7 because I was studying that intensively all week. The explanation is terrific. You would expect that someone who now fancies himself a mild expert on the passage would find plenty to be disappointed with. In fact, the opposite was the case. I felt for a fleeting second like it meant that I did not need to write a blog post on my thoughts on Romans 7 (as previously suggested). Not only were the comments thorough, they were fair.
Then I flipped over to Revelation 20. My impression from looking over the list of contributors (BTW, what do you know but that the people who wrote the notes and the articles actually got credit for it in this Bible. At the front and in a very clear format.) was that the dispensational viewpoint was not well-represented. I ‘ll go back and look that over later, but my feeling of Revelation 20 was that the notes were fair. The Reformed brothers weren’t trying to rub it in our faces like we would do to them but gave both views in an even-handed way.
Then I jumped over to Jeremiah 22:30 which I am studying for a study group I’m involved in. Here there were no options, but only one suggested solution, which was both new to me, but also unsatisfactory. Ok, not perfect.
One last thing – you can’t flip pages without the color maps and beautiful reconstruction diagrams jumping out at you. This makes the Bible more appealing and useful.
Oh, also, I haven’t checked this out yet, but the Bible comes with a code to get the entire contents of the ESVSB for free online. Which means that if I want to put a portion of their comments on Romans 7 on my blog, I don’t have to re-type them. I like that.
One really last thing – if I’m going to hold this thing in my hand, I’m going to have to start working out.
please, please, please, post your thoughts on romans 7….
Natalie – I appreciate that request. That has pushed me over the edge and I have just finished writing about it, and I will post it probably tomorrow.
Todd…you are so hilarious and helpful…the perfect combo…I laughed out loud multiple times throughout this post.
thanx for the review of ESV on high.
Looks pretty awesome – I’m disgruntled that though I preordered mine months ago, Amazon isn’t shipping it till next week.
“The Reformed brothers weren ‘t trying to rub it in our faces *like we would do to them* but gave both views in an even-handed way.”
LOL =) This immediately brought to mind the MacBible’s (in)famous reference to Prov 30:6 under “infant baptism” in the back:
“Do not add to His words or He will reprove you, and you will be proved a liar.”
I’m not sure if this was a joke that somehow got printed accidentally, but I heard it was removed from later printings. That was pretty funny – but if I believed in infant baptism and bought that Bible I would be more than a little miffed about it.
Anyhow, the ESV sounds good.
Danny – it was obviously a prank that some low-level miscreant in the editing process made. That is obvious to all who know the authors and editors and their character. I hope they caught the perpetrator and punished him severely. On another note, it’s quite legitimate for an individual (MacArthur, Sproul, Ryrie) to have study notes that reflect their own viewpoint, or to have a “Reformed” or “Dispensational” approaches, appropriately noted. The ESVSB is trying to be useful to the broader evangelical world and from what I’ve seen, they’d done pretty good. (They did botch the note on Urim/Thumim in 1 Sam 14 though.)
Wow – that Bible looks about the same size as my Strong’s concordance! Gigantic. I bet it’s amazing. Better than the Archaeology Bible?
Shireen – the Archaeology Bible has a very narrow focus and contains much info (and photos) not in the ESVSB. The ESVSB is intended to be as broad as possible, covering some history, archaeology, theology, etc. For a general study Bible, the ESVSB is clearly better.
Hi Todd! I am working at a Christian Bookstore here on Maui. We got a Chronological Study Bible done by Thomas Nelson a few weeks ago. I’ve been tempted to buy it and was wondering if you have any comments on it if you’ve heard of it. I mean, after Old Testament Archaeology, I should be able to decipher these things, but I’m afraid I don’t quite trust myself. Also, I appreciate your comments on the ESV Study Bible. I plan on picking one up in the hardcover. You’re blessed to have it in the calfskin! :) Hope you and the fam are doing well!
p.s. I posted this same comment on another blog because I’m not sure how this works…as in if you would have to search for my comment since it was an earlier post.
Paula – you’re “working” on “Maui” – is that possible? As for the Chronological Study Bible, I haven’t seen it, but from what I know, I have reason to believe that I would not like it.
As for blog comments, all of them are sent to me by email, so I get them no matter which post you comment on.