October 28

By | October 28, 2009

Yesterday I read a book entitled The PC is Not a Typewriter.  If you ‘re a nerd like me, you might enjoy it.  The book was written in 1995, so I thought that it would be so out-dated and basic that I would have nothing to learn.  But I was wrong.  Some things are a bit beyond the needs of a dissertation (which is the goal of the course for which the book was assigned), but it was helpful to see some typewriter conventions that need not be carried over in computer use.  One example that I will have a very hard time breaking: not putting two spaces after a period.  I think, horror of horrors, that I even encouraged students to do this, and in years much more recent than 1995.  On the other side, I  wish that this was the only thing I taught incorrectly.

Randy Alcorn embraces biblical paradox and provides some good quotations from Spurgeon.  One quotation: “My love of consistency with my own doctrinal views is not great enough to allow me knowingly to alter a single text of Scripture.”  If you agree with that statement, you are on the road to dispensationalism.

One sermon I’m looking forward to preach will have as the primary application that true Christians don’t sit next to the aisle.  But Jon Acuff says it so much better.

A baby carriage rolls and falls off the platform and is run over by a train.  In some inexplicable way, the baby was not harmed.

It’s “dress up as a Bible character” night at Awana.  You guessed it: Mark dressed up as David and Luke as Goliath.

Three Views on the Millennium

By | October 27, 2009

I don’t know if you have two hours to listen to a debate about the millennium, but I enjoyed this one even though my view was not represented.  The other thing missing from this debate: the Old Testament!  Too bad God wasted all that time writing those books that describe in extraordinary detail the future.  But the “Evening of Eschatology” was helpful for a number of reasons and I would recommend it to you.  The Desiring God website gives you the option to watch the video or download the mp3 file.

(In case you don’t know, my view is dispensational premillennial, which differs from historic premillennialism by affirming God’s specific purposes for Israel, as distinct from the church, in the future.  Much, but not all, of what the premillennial speaker says I agree with.)

not so subtle hint

Errancy as the Gateway Heresy

By | October 26, 2009

Throughout my life the Lord has led me places where at the time I had no idea of just how significant it would be in preparing me for the future.  It’s astonishing to me how many of these there are and how clueless I have been along the way.  One example is that in my final semester of college I chose 1) to write a paper and 2) the subject was the inerrancy of the Bible.  I approached it with an open mind, read lots of material on both sides, and came to a firm conclusion.  I have been thankful for that time and again.

I read a paper tonight which isn’t the first and last word on the subject by any means, but I found that it had a number of good points that I had not considered recently or at all.  I recommend it to you. 

I ‘ll cite two paragraphs to spark your interest.

Denison either misunderstands or misconstrues the concept of the “slippery slope.” Personally, rather than using the phrase “slippery slope,” I prefer to speak of the denial of biblical inerrancy as a “gateway heresy,” deliberately drawing from the characterization of marijuana as a “gateway drug.” Those who argue that marijuana is a “gateway drug” are not claiming that every person who smokes marijuana must necessarily move on to heroin. Neither are they claiming that every heroin addict also is a marijuana user. Rather, they are attempting to demonstrate that marijuana use leads to the use of other drugs often enough to be statistically significant.

Likewise, history demonstrates a clear statistical pattern of people who first reject biblical inerrancy and then reject other important Christian doctrines. One could cite individual anecdotes such as Southern Seminary Professor Crawford Howell Toy, who abandoned biblical inerrancy and eventually left orthodox Christianity. Another approach would be to analyze such groups as the homosexuality-affirming Alliance of Baptists and compare the percentage of their membership affirming inerrancy with the percentage of Southern Baptists affirming inerrancy. In doing this, the objective would not be to demonstrate that no exceptions exist, but simply to show that most who become heretics deny inerrancy first, and that the denial of inerrancy strongly predisposes one to deny other important Christian doctrines as well. One can agree with Denison that it is possible for a person to deny biblical inerrancy and yet cling to some of the Bible’s important teachings, yet we can also say that however possible this state may be, it often does not endure over the span of generations in the majority of those who deny the inerrancy of the Bible. The well-beaten path, trodden by Mainline denominations and institutions all around us, is from the denial of inerrancy to the denial of other vital Christian doctrines.

How Do You Deal With Your Critics? (MacArthur)

By | October 25, 2009

John MacArthur preached on “The Centrality of Forgiveness in Unity” last year in TMC Faculty/Staff chapel and it was so beneficial that copies were made for everyone.  Fortunately, I’m on the list and was mailed a copy.  The whole message is good, but I especially liked this portion and so I typed it out and made an audio clip (mp3) from the CD for you, my dear readers.

And then one final thought.  And maybe this is the most important one for you to keep in mind.  All the injuries committed against you, all the injustices committed against you, all the offenses committed against you are your trials by which God perfects you. 

You have to change how you view them.  People often say to me, How do you deal with your critics?  How do you deal with people that say terrible things about you?  How do you deal with people that lie about you?  How do you deal with people that put stuff on the internet that is not true about you?  How do you deal with that? 

The simple answer is this.  Look, I’m not perfect.  I need perfecting.  And whatever God chooses to allow to come against me I have to embrace as a trial which in the purposes of God is designed for me to be more like Christ.

So you embrace those things.  You felt like you were not treated right.  You felt like you were treated in an unfair way.  You felt like you were misrepresented.  You felt like you were misunderstood.

Oh my, I hear that, that’s a daily thing for me.  You would be amazed at what people say I said.  Or say I did, or didn’t do.  All those injuries, all those offenses, all those assaults and attacks are the trials that perfect me.  That’s why James said, “Count it all joy when you fall into various trials.”  Because those are the things that perfect your faith.

Peter said it this way, 1 Peter 5:10, “After you have suffered a while, the Lord make you perfect.” Or Paul said it in 2 Corinthians 12:7 that he was content with persecutions, trials, suffering.  Because when he was weak then he was strong.  God’s strength is perfected in his weakness.

So embrace all of those iniquities in life.  Embrace all of those things that don’t seem fair to you.  Embrace all of the false accusations, all the offenses against you, all the sins against you.  Embrace them.  They are the God-permitted trials which when responded to correctly become the very things that make you strong.

Christian Academics

By | October 23, 2009

This blog post says better than I could a number of things that have grieved me in recent years.  If you ‘re teaching or planning to teach the Bible, please read it.  If you ‘re thinking of sending your child to a “Christian college,” please read it.  If you ‘re considering beginning a seminary education, please read it.

http://blog.9marks.org/2009/10/beware-your-seminary-professors.html

Just one clip:

In the Western secular academy, one of the highest values is an open exchange of ideas without pre-judgment, a value which has clearly transmitted into Christian academic circles. Yes, there should be a place for Christians to openly consider new ideas, but consider the anthropology behind that democratic value: it assumes (these days, at least) that people are rational, objective, and basically good. When this is our starting point, we feel free to say whatever, whenever. An elder has a very different starting point. He knows that his sheep are weak and susceptible to temptation and self-deceit. Like a parent, he knows that intellectual growth is highly intertwined with spiritual and social maturity. So he takes great care in what he says and does not say. He’s not nearly so democratic. Instead, he must be judicious.

I have a myriad of thoughts floating in my brain, but I think I ‘ll just let you read this and save my comments for future times.

The Depth of Man’s Stupidity

By | October 22, 2009

This is a long quote from a dead guy, so you ‘re going to be tempted to skip it.  Go ahead, I dare you.

Epictetus was a Stoic philosopher who lived in the 1st century AD.  This is a portion of his section entitled “Of Providence.” 

“I declare, by Zeus and all the gods, one single fact of nature would suffice to make him that is reverent and grateful realize the providence of God: no great matter, I mean; take the mere fact that milk is produced from grass and cheese from milk and wool from skin.  Who is it that has created or contrived these things?

“‘No one, ‘ he says.

“Oh the depth of man’s stupidity and shamelessness!

“If we had sense we ought to do nothing else, in public and in private, than praise and bless God and pay him due thanks.  Ought we not, as we dig and plough and eat, to sing the hymn to God?  ‘Great is God that he gave us these instruments wherewith we shall till the earth.  Great is God that he has given us hands, and power to swallow, and a belly, and the power to grow without knowing it, and to draw our breath in sleep. ‘  At every moment we ought to sing these praises and above all the greatest and divinest praise, that God gave us the faculty to comprehend these gifts and to use the way of reason.

“More than that: since most of you are walking in blindness, should there not be some one to discharge this duty and sing praises to God for all?  What else can a lame old man as I am do but chant the praise of God?  If, indeed, I were a nightingale I should sing as a nightingale, if a swan, as a swan: but as I am a rational creature I must praise God.  This is my task, and I do it: and I will not abandon this duty, so long as it is given me; and I invite you all to join in this same song.

Epictetus was not a Christian, but he was not as blind as many others who lived in his world and in ours.  He did live part of his life in Rome, and Paul wrote to the Romans in the 1st century:

Romans 1:18-23 (NIV) “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.”

(Translation from C. K. Barrett, The New Testament Background: Selected Documents, 1st ed., p. 67.)

Kingdom Today? A Poll

By | October 21, 2009

With limited time tonight and a desire to get some feedback from time to time, I’ve created the first poll at this blog.

Why this particular question? I’m currently doing some reading on it in preparation for a meeting of our study group tomorrow. With some polls I anticipate doing, there isn’t necessarily a right answer. But there is with this one. Nevertheless, it is anonymous, so you can be wrong without fear of retribution (from me).

October 19

By | October 19, 2009

A long time ago I wished aloud for a better way to access old TMC chapel messages.  Somebody else must have had the same desireVery nice!  Where to start?  How about Dr. Pilkey or Dr. Bookman or Harry Walls?

How do you sign your email?  Sincerely, regards, cheers?  It turns out that I’m not the only one who struggles.

Until recently I mailed checks I received into my bank in California for deposit.  I did this for years from Israel and continued it when I got here.  Unfortunately one of the deposits I mailed was never received by the bank.  Doubly unfortunately one of those checks was from a copyright violator who finally paid up.  So I switched to deposit by ATM.  This is certainly fool-proof, as the checks cannot get lost in the mail.  But they can, I learned, get lost in the machine.  The machine ate the checks (in a bank envelope) but then claimed it had not.  (They were found a few days later, probably by the guy emptying the ATM.)  Sigh.

I don’t think I posted this before.  The blue and green colors are the same color.

AnimatedHebrew.com seems to have some nice resources for learning biblical Hebrew.  A link on it led to a good recording of the priestly blessing (Num 6:24-26) in flash format so you can read along.  I found the mp3 version of it on the lower left of this page, entitled “The Aaronic Benediction” along with a few others.

19 years ago today I started dating a girl.

Course Textbooks This Semester

By | October 15, 2009

I have been asked in a comment on the previous post to list the textbooks for the courses this semester. 

1. Research Procedures

Required texts:

Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers. 7th ed. Revised by Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, and the University of Chicago Press editorial staff. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

Alexander, Patrick H., et al., eds. The SBL Handbook of Style for Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Early Christian Studies. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.

Suggested texts:

Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. The Craft of Research. 2nd ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

The Chicago Manual of Style. 15th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Mauch, James E., and Jack W. Birch. Guide to the Successful Thesis and Dissertation: A Hand-book for Students and Faculty. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1998.

Strunk, William, Jr. The Elements of Style. 4th ed. With Revisions, an Introduction, and a Chapter on Writing by E. B. White. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.

2. New Testament Backgrounds

The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations. 3d ed. Edited and translated by Michael W. Holmes. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2007.

Boccaccini, Gabriele. The Roots of Rabbinic Judaism: An Intellectual History, from Ezekiel to Daniel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.

Bock, Darrell L. The Missing Gospels: Unearthing the Truth behind Alternate Christianities. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2006.

Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1983-85.

Elliott, J. K., ed. The Apocryphal Jesus: Legends of the Early Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Evans, Craig A., and Stanley E. Porter, eds. Dictionary of New Testament Background. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000.

Evans, Craig A. Ancient Texts for New Testament Studies: A Guide to the Background Literature. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2005.

García Martínez, Florentino, ed. The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English. 2d ed. Translated by Wilfred G. E. Watson. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996.

The Gnostic Scriptures. A New Translation with Annotations and Introductions. Translated and edited by Bentley Layton. Anchor Bible Reference Library, ed. David Noel Freedman. New York: Doubleday, 1995.

Harding, Mark, ed. Early Christian Life and Thought in Social Context. London: T & T Clark, 2003.

Instone-Brewer, David. Traditions of The Rabbis from the Era of the New Testament: Prayer and Agriculture (TRENT). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.

Jefford, Clayton J. Reading the Apostolic Father: An Introduction. Peabody, MA Hendrickson, 1996.

Josephus. Complete Works of Josephus. Translated by William Whiston. Edinburgh: William P. Nimmo; Philadelphia: Porter and Coates, 1867. Reprint, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1987.

Klauck, Hans-Josef. The Religious Context of Early Christianity: A Guide to Graeco-Roman Religions. London: T & T Clark, 2000.

Levine , Amy-Jill, Dale C. Allison Jr., and John Dominic Crossan, eds. The Historical Jesus in Context. Princeton Readings in Religions, ed. Donald S. Lopez Jr. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

Malherbe, Abraham J. Moral Exhortation: A Greco-Roman Sourcebook. Library of Early Christianity, ed. Wayne A. Meeks, vol. 4. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1986.

McLay, R. Timothy. The Use of the Septuagint in New Testament Research. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2003.

Meyer, Marvin W., ed. The Ancient Mysteries: A Source Book. Sacred Texts of the Mystery Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean World. San Francisco: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1987. Reprint, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.

Rudolph, Kurt. Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism. London: T & T Clark, 1998.

The Mishnah: A New Translation. Translated by Jacob Neusner. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.

The New Testament Background: Writings from Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire that Illumine Christian Origins. Revised ed. Edited by C. K. Barrett. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1989.

Philo. The Works of Philo: Complete and Unabridged. New updated ed. Translated by C. D. Yonge. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1993.

Strack, Hermann L., and Gunter Stemberger. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash. 2d ed. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1996.

These are all required (to purchase).  There are others that are suggested, and others that are required for reading.

3. Greco-Roman Backgrounds

Hans-Josef Klauck, The Religious Context of Early Christianity: A Guide to Greco-Roman Religions. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003).

John McRay. Archaeology and the New Testament. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1991).

Others are suggested.

Courses This Semester

By | October 14, 2009

In previous semesters, I have commented here on the courses I was taking.  We ‘re about eight weeks into the semester, but I thought some might be interested in knowing what I’m doing.  As always, whenever I talk about these things, I feel that my work is unworthy because I’m not studying stuff that is impossible to understand, and thus “doctoral.”  My studies continue to help me know a little bit about a lot.

This is my fourth semester of PhD coursework and kinda my last.  I say “kinda” because I have five units remaining.  These are not “coursework” per se, but rather are independent study that you pay thousands of dollars for.  Five units shouldn’t take long, right?  18 units was manageable in one semester in college.  Well, these five units will take a full year, including the summer.  But I’m getting ahead of myself.

This semester I have three courses: one for one unit, one for two units, and one for three units.  If you’ve done much work in higher education, then you know that the number of units has no relationship to the amount of work required.  My two-unit course, for instance, requires at least 300 pages of (often difficult) reading each week.  It’s nice they give us all that learning for a lower price.

After three semesters of fun and good times, this semester I have no Bible courses.  I mean that in two ways.  First, I have no courses in the Bible Exposition department (my department).  Second, I have no courses focused on the Bible.  We study things around the Bible, but not the Bible.  This will cease on December 18 and at that point I will study only the Bible, henceforth and forevermore.  On to my courses:

1. Research Procedures.  This class is all about Turabian, bibliographies, footnotes, library research, database searching, plagiarism, and other stuff we haven’t made it to yet.  These are important matters for graduate research.  I remember my first semester in a masters program and I knew almost nothing about these subjects from my college years.  Fortunately my thesis adviser insisted on the (divine) parenthetical citation method, unlike later programs which are enslaved to an impossibly complex and evil system of footnotes.

2. New Testament Backgrounds.  This is the bargain course that I mentioned above.  Like Research Procedures, it is a required class for all PhD students.  Each week we tackle a new subject.  Our reading is primarily in the primary sources.  So we don’t read as much about the Talmud as we read the Talmud.  So far we ‘ve had a week each on the Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Josephus, Mishnah/Talmud, Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Philo.  Most of these guys will bore you to tears in less than ten pages.  This week I’m reading targums and midrash.  In weeks to come we ‘ll be looking at Greco-Roman literature, Greco-Roman religion, non-literary sources, Apostolic Fathers, Gnostic Literature and NT Apocrypha.  I ‘ll be writing a paper this semester on the backgrounds of Jesus’s cleansing of the temple.

3. Greco-Roman Backgrounds.  This is my required NT elective.  To clarify, I am required to take an NT course, and this was my choice.  You might think, based on the title, that it has significant overlap with NT Backgrounds.  So far I have seen no overlap.  For this class we ‘re reading two books, only one of which I have required in a course I have taught.  But there’s so much to learn that I am certainly not bored.  The second book is comprised of material that is entirely new to me.  For instance, this morning I was reading about emperor worship.  I’ve been to sites where mystery religions were important or where Asclepius was worshipped, but I’ve never sat down to study these.  This is my chance.  I have to do seven smaller research projects for this class, and currently I’m studying Pompeii.  Ever since I visited Pompeii in 2005, I’ve been convinced that an understanding of this city would be quite helpful to New Testament readers, even though it is never mentioned by name.  Pompeii is extraordinarily well preserved because it was destroyed in an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79. 

So that’s it.  I’m also part of a study group that is preparing for the written and oral comprehensive exams.  In my free time, I’ve taken up surfing, mountain climbing, and crochet.  I’ve had to cut TV down to less than 4 hours a day though.