Israeli Responses to the New Testament

By | February 14, 2009

The experience of one Israeli Jew who ventured to read the New Testament in public might surprise you. From the Caspari Center Media Review:

Ariel Shinbal was reintroduced to the concept of "conversion to Christianity" with a rude shock, according to his column in the religious weekly Makor Rishon last week (January 30). Having thought that the idea was merely a historical vestige, on par, in the basement of his brain, with the Viking heritage and Atlantis, he had long assumed that "Today, no Jew has any interest in converting to Christianity unless he suddenly independently decides to change his religion due to some illumination, and even here we’re only talking about isolated cases, if at all." In order to disabuse his readers of the notion that there is no missionary activity in Israel, however, he invited them to ride on their nearest bus or train "with a New Testament in your hand, and you will discover the long arm of the collective Jewish memory" – an apparent reference to the recent Jews for Jesus PR campaigns in the public media.

Shinbal acknowledged that he himself had not intended to "get involved for no reason with the central book of the Christian religion." It was only in the framework of his MA studies that he was faced – as numerous others have also been – with an assignment which required him to gain some knowledge of "several chapters of the New Testament." "As someone who was educated in the state-religious system, naturally I had never taken up this book in my hand. I confess that when I held it for the first time, the feeling I had was different from all the other books I had ever handled up until then. A slight upset, something internal and embedded, which didn’t allow me to remain indifferent and unperturbed with respect to a book in whose name the crusades had been conducted. But after a few minutes, I got over this and began reading. As I said, I got over it. My surroundings really didn’t, though. The range of reactions to the fact that I was reading the NT shocked me. I’m not only talking about religious people. A completely secular air-conditioning technician who saw me with the book almost fell off his ladder from amazement and shock. Only after I explained why I was reading it and for what – just for my studies and that I really hadn’t come here to baptize him – did he calm down and go back to work. The expression on his face when he saw me with the book – as if I was Torquemada in all his glory and in person – took me completely unawares.

On Shabbat, we were with relatives. Having experienced several days of shocked reactions to seeing the book, I knew that I should downplay the fact that I was actually reading it. I employed various methods, some of which came straight from detective novels. So here’s a tip: The method of hiding behind a newspaper doesn’t work. ‘Ariel, how long are you going to read 7 Days? Give the paper to someone else already.’ ‘Ah, finally. Ah, what’s that small green book? The New Testament! I don’t believe it! Do you know that in our family there’s a tradition of converting to Christianity?’" According to Shinbal, once that argument became emotional, the only way he could put an end to it was to produce a certificate from Bar-Ilan University (itself a religious institution) proving that he was required to read several chapters from the NT for a course – in order to end the speculation "that this was the first stage of a deterioration towards Christianity of an important link in the people of Israel, a deterioration which would ultimately lead, of course, to my crowning in the Vatican as Pope Arelius Shinbolus I."

The responses Shinbal encountered stimulated his curiosity regarding the fear they concealed – the "irrational horror of an history book, somewhat boring chapters in actual fact." In the course of his investigation, he came across the reaction of a well-known religious-Zionist rabbi, published on the internet in answer to a question. He was so struck by its tone that he proceeded to quote extensive excerpts from it: "’How many thousands of Jews have been drowned, burned, suffocated, and raped because of this murderous religion!!!’ ‘How can you calmly read a book which is so steeped in blood!!!’ ‘A book which led the crusaders to drown whole communities of Jews with their women, children, and infants in rivers in the name of this despicable book under the shadow of the accursed cross.’ ‘This is an abominable book in my view and when I see it I light a match and burn it. I suggest that you do the same, simply burn it and turn it into a bonfire.’ ‘Do this in your home and bring your children to watch how you burn this abominable book so that they’ll learn and become wise and know what to do when it comes into their own hands.’"

Shinbal’s own reaction to the rabbi’s response was that "more than I felt disgust that I was holding in my hands a book steeped in blood was a feeling of shame that only at the age of 33 was I encountering for the first time the foundational book of an important and influential world religion. And more than I felt that I needed to burn this book in front of my children’s eyes, I felt that I should calm down somewhat, that I should be proud of our Judaism and stop being so afraid of those who are different and the Other – most of all when this Other is today in a completely different phase from that which it was in several centuries ago."

Quoted with permission from the Caspari Center Media Review (with whom the copyright remains).

The Glorious Hope of Isaiah (#11: The Nations)

By | February 12, 2009

What I am about to say next may shock you.  The key to enjoying Isaiah 13-23 is to read fast.  My point is not that this section was not important when Isaiah delivered it, nor would I argue that there are not good, helpful truths in it today.  I do believe that “all Scripture is inspired and useful….”  But given the feebleness of our minds and the limitedness of our attention spans and the distance between our world and Isaiah’s, I suggest that you almost skip this section when you study or teach through Isaiah.

Here’s an outline to show you what you ‘re missing:

  • The Lord announces his plans for Babylon (13:1–14:23)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Assyria (14:23-27)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Philistia (14:28-32)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Moab (15:1–16:14)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Damascus (17:1-14)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Cush (18:1-7)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Egypt (19:1–20:6)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Babylon (21:1-10)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Dumah (21:11-12)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Arabia (21:13-17)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Jerusalem (22:1-25)
  • The Lord announces his plans for Tyre (23:1-18)

Given that you don’t live in any of those places (or more properly, belong to any of those people), and given that most of these plans have already transpired, and given that the Bible is so huge that you ‘ll never know it all anyway, I think I can safely suggest that your first time through, you need not get hung up here.  Indeed, that, I fear, is a problem too real for too many.  They get bogged down and, unlike when they ‘re playing cars and run into a muddle puddle, they never just pick the car up and plop it down on the other side and keep going.

What is the larger point of this section?  I think it can be summed up this way: by announcing his plans (judgment) on the other nations, the Lord is demonstrating his sovereignty over them.  The God of Israel is also the God of Babylon (not Marduk).  Ok, you say, couldn’t he just say that and move on?  I think that God had more in mind.  He wanted to display to the world that he could do what their gods could not.  As he says in a challenge to the gods:

Isaiah 41:23 (ESV) “Tell us what is to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods; do good, or do harm, that we may be dismayed and terrified.”

The oracles of chapters 13-23 do not describe the sins of the nations.  You might expect that they would.  But they instead declare God’s judgment against them with much detail.  He tells the nations what will happen before it happens so that they will know the Lord is God. 

Ho, hum, you’ve heard this before, right?  Wait and consider the time in which Isaiah spoke.  Isaiah has already prophesied that Assyria would invade and destroy Israel.  Shortly he will predict that Babylon will carry off the treasures and princes of Judah (Isa 39).  The Philistines and the Moabites and the rest would either take advantage of Israel’s judgment or gloat in her downfall, and all would be tempted to conclude that the weakest god of all was the god of Israel.

God really had himself in a bind.  On the one hand, he was duty-bound to punish Israel for her covenant violations.  If he did not, he would be a faithless God.  On the other hand, if he had Israel carried off into exile as he had threatened, then it would appear that he was a lesser god than Marduk and Dagon and Chemosh and the rest.  How did God get out of this bind?  Isaiah to the rescue!  Through this prophet (and others), the Lord made it clear that his sovereignty was not impugned by Israel’s exile.  In fact, the most glorious passages of the Lord’s sovereign control over the world and history are probably in Isaiah.

Now all of this, quite frankly, is off our topic of the thread of messianic hope.  But I’ve already repeatedly made a point in this series that is relevant here.  Throughout this section, as in chapters 1-12, the bulk of the message is dark judgment, but the prophet intersperses some glimmers of hope.  I include just a couple here to warm your heart. 

Isaiah 16:4b-5 (ESV) “When the oppressor is no more, and destruction has ceased, and he who tramples underfoot has vanished from the land, 5 then a throne will be established in steadfast love, and on it will sit in faithfulness in the tent of David one who judges and seeks justice and is swift to do righteousness.””

Isaiah 17:7-8 (ESV) “In that day man will look to his Maker, and his eyes will look on the Holy One of Israel. 8 He will not look to the altars, the work of his hands, and he will not look on what his own fingers have made, either the Asherim or the altars of incense.”

Now having said that, I realize another reality: if you just read these verses above, out of context as they are, your heart may not be warmed.  But if you are an Israelite and you ‘re listening to these messages of doom and then you hear these verses, I think your spirit soars.  So maybe I was wrong after all.  Read chapters 13-23.  But don’t try to figure everything out.  Instead keep your highlighter handy for the iron-clad promises of hope that God made to his people. And rejoice that he is Lord of the nations, powerful without limits, righteous without exception, and faithful every time.

February 9

By | February 9, 2009

A Palestinian journalist has some very insightful thoughts about the current situation in Gaza, the West Bank and Israel.  It’s not short, but it’s honest.

John Piper’s latest biographical sermon is now available (audio, text).  His subject was George Whitefield and his title was “‘I Will Not Be a Velvet-Mouthed Preacher! ‘ The Life and Ministry of George Whitefield: Living and Preaching as Though God Were Real (Because He Is).”

There’s a guy still living who fought in World War I.  In this article, he mentions talking to his grandmother, born in 1817.  It makes you think differently about how quickly time passes and how stories could be passed on.

24 things about to disappear in America.  Some won’t surprise you, but some might.

Is it possible to become an Israeli citizen if you ‘re not Jewish by blood and not Jewish by faith?  I know a guy who is.  He wanted to join the army, but they wouldn’t take him unless he was a citizen.  He tried to become a citizen, but they wouldn’t take him because he wasn’t in the army.  Somehow he managed both.  The JPost has an article of another guy who managed to get permanent residency.  This will probably fuel a few dreams.

The Glorious Hope of Isaiah (#10: Matthew’s Understanding)

By | February 8, 2009

One of the most delightful discoveries in my study of Isaiah was seeing how Matthew understood Isaiah.  In short, Matthew recognized that Jesus was the very one that Isaiah had spoken of.  When we look at the second half of Isaiah, I ‘ll show you how that plays out there, but in this post I want you to see how Matthew presents Jesus as the figure that Isaiah develops in chapters 6-12.

It is commonly known that Matthew begins his gospel with the genealogy of Jesus.  The casual reader recognizes that Jesus is the last in a long line of kings and heirs to the Davidic throne.  The natural observation is that if Israel had sovereignty when Jesus was born, he would be the next king.  Rather than presenting an uninterrupted line of succession, however, Matthew breaks the genealogy at two places, creating three lists of fourteen generations each.  While this may well have been done for mnemonic (memory) purposes, the places where the breaks are made are important.  The first break is at “David the king.”  The second break is at the “deportation to Babylon.”  To make sure that you don’t miss this, Matthew repeats that this is his structure in verse 17. 

The focus on David is easily understood as he was the founder of the dynasty and the recipient of a promise that his line would always hold the throne (2 Sam 7:9-16).  The longing for the “son of David” who would fulfill this promise is well known (and see Matt 1:20).  The reason why Matthew emphasizes the exile in the genealogy may not be as obvious, especially if you don’t understand Isaiah 6-10.  The prophecy of Immanuel says that not only will a child be born, but he will be raised in poverty which is the result of invasion.  In chapters 7-10, Isaiah predicts the coming of Assyria.  This is the beginning of Israel’s subjugation which later results in the deportation by Babylon (predicted in chapter 39).  In chapters 40-48, Isaiah foresees a physical restoration from exile under Cyrus.  But the exile does not end with that.  Israel does not have independence from foreign rule, and the spiritual exile is surely never resolved.  By breaking the genealogy at the exile, I believe that Matthew is reminding his readers both of their present exile as well as the fact that one born in that exile would deliver from that exile.  I ‘ll talk more about this when we get to the Servant Songs in chapters 42-53.

That Jesus is the “Immanuel” predicted in Isaiah 7:14 is stated in no uncertain terms by Matthew.  Mary was a virgin; her conception was by the Holy Spirit.  The virgin would bear a son.  The boy will save his people from their sins.  All of this comes right out of Isaiah, and all but the last sentence comes from chapter 7.  As he quotes 7:14, Matthew says, “All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet” (Matt 1:23).  Jesus is Immanuel, “God with us,” the heir of the house of David, born in poverty to a people in exile.  As Jesus grows up, we see that he indeed knows how to “refuse the evil and choose the good” (Isa 7:15-16).

After Jesus’s baptism and temptation, he begins his ministry.  It is interesting how Matthew introduces this, and if you don’t know (or read) Isaiah, you ‘ll miss something.  I ‘ll quote it here so your memory is refreshed (and perhaps you ‘ll make a typical mistake).

Matthew 4:12-16 (ESV) “Now when he heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew into Galilee. 13 And leaving Nazareth he went and lived in Capernaum by the sea, in the territory of Zebulun and Naphtali, 14 so that what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled: 15 “The land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali, the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles— 16 the people dwelling in darkness have seen a great light, and for those dwelling in the region and shadow of death, on them a light has dawned.””

On the face of it, you might think that Matthew is merely explaining why Jesus ministered in Galilee.  Of course, he is doing that.  But he’s doing much more.  By quoting this passage, he is identifying Jesus with the light prophesied in Isaiah 9.  When you keep reading in Isaiah 9, you see that this light is a child, a son, one who carries the government on his shoulder and who is called “Mighty God” and “Prince of Peace.”  This individual will rule on the throne of David and over his kingdom without end.  Matthew expects you to make this connection; he is not quoting out of context.  Matthew is saying that the one Isaiah prophesied has arrived.

You could wish that Matthew was even more blatant.  Why didn’t he go ahead and quote Isaiah 9:6-7?  One reason may be that Matthew wasn’t anticipating the biblically illiterate readers of the 20th century; he expected his readers would be familiar with the Bible and would grasp this.  In fact, I think that Matthew was quite kind to us.  He could, legitimately I believe, expected us to know that Jesus was the fulfillment of Isaiah 9 because he already told us that Jesus was the fulfillment of Isaiah 7.  And, as I have shown already, the individual prophesied in chapter 7 is the same one as in chapters 9 and 11.  But just so that no one misses it, Matthew states it explicitly: Jesus is the figure of Isaiah 7; Jesus is the figure of Isaiah 9.

What do you expect Matthew to say next?  If Jesus is “God with us,” the righteous Son of David, what should naturally follow?  Yep, you guessed it.  The very next verse, Matthew 4:17, records the first words spoken by Jesus in Matthew’s gospel.

Matthew 4:17 (ESV) “From that time Jesus began to preach, saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.””

What is the kingdom of heaven?  Is it a warm fuzzy feeling in the hearts of those whose lives are submitted to God?  Is it a spiritual reign over a perverse world?  Not according to Matthew.  Isaiah does not only tell us about the king, but he describes the kingdom.  He does that in chapter 9 and is more expansive in chapter 11.  Matthew’s point is clear: Jesus is the king and he has come to bring the kingdom of righteousness and peace.  Jesus would rule on David’s throne.  This throne was a real (big) chair in Jerusalem, and sitting on it meant that you were in charge of the earthly affairs of the Israelite kingdom.  The king would uplift the oppressed and strike down the wicked (Isa 11:4).  Wolves would lie down with sheep, lions would become vegetarians, and the earth would be full of the knowledge of the Lord.  That’s the “kingdom of heaven” that Jesus preached was “at hand.”

Now there are some kindly folk who think they ‘re getting Jesus out of a bind because quite obviously an earthly kingdom of worldwide peace was not established during Jesus’s ministry.  They keep Jesus from being a liar by explaining that in fact Jesus was not talking about an earthly kingdom.  Since no earthly kingdom appeared, what Jesus really meant was a kingdom in which he ruled in the hearts of those who loved him.  All of that imagery, you understand, should be understood metaphorically.  Ok, I ‘ll bite.  Let’s play that game for a minute.  The poor are now uplifted because Jesus is in their hearts; they ‘re so happy they don’t need a righteous judge in the law court.  The wolf that lives with the lamb, that must be what’s happening in my heart, as bad thoughts and good thoughts live happily together.  The child who plays with the snake, spiritually that must be fulfilled in that I can go into
(spiritually) dangerous places (like a bar) and yet not be hurt.  The highway from Assyria that the Jews can return to Israel on, uh, hmm.  You see, the only way that spiritualizing a passage like this works is by so generalizing it that details are completely irrelevant.  This type of interpretation is not controlled by the text; it says what the interpreter wants it to say.  You can understand it in a thousand different ways and no one could prove you wrong. 

I believe in metaphors and symbolic language, but we must not create them where the author did not intend them.  When Isaiah said that Assyria was going to smash Israel, the Israelites didn’t feel a cold and sharp feeling in their hearts (that’s the opposite of warm and fuzzy); they felt a hook through their lip as they were being dragged out of their land.  When Isaiah said that after the Lord was finished with Assyria, he would destroy them (Isa 10:25-27), that’s exactly what happened (609 B.C.).  Why is it that Isaiah’s prophecies of judgment were literally fulfilled, but his predictions of restoration are assumed to be 1) symbolic—thus a “spiritual reign” in our hearts, and 2) diverted—thus the descendants of the Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians and other Gentiles (but not the Jews) get the blessings as the church?  Very simply, the reason why the “kingdom” is reinterpreted in such monstrous ways is to save Jesus from lying or being mistaken.  The Jewish people today get this.  They wonder, if Jesus was Immanuel, the Prince of Peace, where is this kingdom that he was supposed to bring?  They are asking exactly the right question.  In fact, the book of Matthew was largely written to answer just that question.  That’s for another day.  The point I must insist upon today is that we are being dishonest if we re-define Jesus’s (and Isaiah’s and Matthew’s) terms in order to save him.  Jesus was the king of Isaiah 7-12, born to the prophesied virgin, born as the legal heir to the throne.  The kingdom that he came to bring was the kingdom that Isaiah described.  The reason that the kingdom was not established was not because it was really something altogether different.

I close with two graphics that summarize most of what I’ve tried to cover thus far.  If you prefer, you can download the PowerPoint and more extensive explanatory notes.  In the first graphic, the point is that as Isaiah slides back and forth from judgment to hope, he is talking about a single judgment (deportation beginning with Assyria) and a single hope (an individual).  The blue line goes back and forth between judgment (low) and ever-increasing and ever-defined hope (high).  The chapter numbers are at the bottom.

Judgment and Hope in Isaiah 6-12

The point of the second graphic is to show how Matthew recognizes Isaiah’s point and argues that Jesus is the fulfillment of this prophesied individual.

Matthew's Use of Isaiah 6-12

The case is made stronger when you consider how the whole of Matthew uses the whole of Isaiah, and I ‘ll show you that later, but as this portion is somewhat defined and easy to see, I thought it good to give you a taste now. 

February 3

By | February 3, 2009

Dallas Seminary is in the news.  Unfortunately it’s because the VP of Finance embezzled $165,000.  If you watch the video, you ‘ll feel sorry for the wife who declares his innocence because “I know my husband.” 

So who should you vote for in the upcoming election in Israel?  This site reveals your political position based upon your answers to questions.

Sovereign Grace Music is having a real cheap music and book sale through February 28. 

John MacArthur answered a lot of personal questions in a recent Q&A celebrating his 40 years of ministry at Grace Community Church.

I really doubt that all of these are women drivers.

The Glorious Hope of Isaiah (#9: The Kingdom)

By | February 1, 2009

You should have your devotions in Isaiah 11.  Every day for a month.  Besides being filled with hope of the world that is coming, you would be inoculated from much false understanding of the New Testament.  You wouldn’t say, as the DTS professor who spoke at my church this morning said, that we the church are the kingdom.  Of course, one doesn’t define the kingdom by a single passage only, but Isaiah 11 is as good a place as any to start. 

There are two ways to understand the kingdom: 1) Read the Book from beginning to end, in which case you ‘ll see a marvelous development as God progressively reveals new and wonderful truths; 2) Read the Book from end to beginning, in which case you ‘ll have to disregard, ignore, or re-define as you continue.  I’m committed to method #1, even if that means I’m called dirty names like “dispensationalist.”  Oh, what an awful term.  I’d much rather be called a “forward” Christian. But, to the happy revelation of Isaiah 11!

It’s probably easiest to focus on the most picturesque portion of this chapter – a wolf dwelling with a lamb and so on (Isa 11:6-8).  But Isaiah begins with the ruler.  It is the ruler of this new age that makes everything else possible. Of course, the prophet has already introduced this ruler to us.  He is the stump of chapter 6, the Immanuel of chapter 7, and the Prince of Peace of chapter 9.  In Isaiah 7:14, the prophecy of a virgin birth was given to the royal house, and in Isaiah 9:7, he rules on the throne of David.  So it is no surprise here that he is “a shoot from the stump of Jesse.”  Perhaps it refers to Jesse instead of David to suggest that this ruler will be like David himself and not like one of his failed descendants.  David had the Spirit of God upon him (1 Sam 16:13), but the shoot of Jesse is described in terms that far surpass any king of Judah.

Isaiah 11:2-5 (ESV) “And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord. 3 And his delight shall be in the fear of the Lord. He shall not judge by what his eyes see, or decide disputes by what his ears hear, 4 but with righteousness he shall judge the poor, and decide with equity for the meek of the earth; and he shall strike the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips he shall kill the wicked. 5 Righteousness shall be the belt of his waist, and faithfulness the belt of his loins.”

This is the description of the perfect king.  Whatever one thinks of Obama, Reagan, FDR, Lincoln or any other human ruler, surely none of them could be described in these terms.  Solomon was a great judge, but this one will not be dependent upon his eyes or his ears.  David was a righteous king, but he murdered those who were in his way (2 Sam 11:11-14).  Hezekiah feared the Lord, but he also showed off his wealth to foreigners.  As I said, read this passage many times, and rejoice, for one day this person will rule the earth.

The Isaiah 11 passage is special because it so clearly combines a description of the king (verses 1-5) with a description of his kingdom (verses 6-16).  A modern-day writer might be tempted to state these realities in matter-of-fact terms, but Isaiah paints a beautiful picture of a child leading a calf and a lion, and of an infant playing around a snake’s den.  The prophet is showing us that the fundamental relationships of this world order are altered under the Prince of Peace.  The cause of this is declared simply:

Isaiah 11:9 (ESV) “They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.”

The king will be recognized by all peoples, and “of him shall the nations inquire.”  Some shall apparently resist the king (Isa 11:14), but the Lord’s plan will not be thwarted.  He will bring his people back to the land of Israel from all of the nations.  In Isaiah’s day, many Israelites were carried off to Assyria, but in the Ruler’s day, he will make a highway for them to return on (Isa 11:16). 

Here’s a miracle, for those of you who know a bit about Israelite history: “Ephraim shall not be jealous of Judah, and Judah shall not harass Ephraim.”  To think that these tribes could get along, one must really believe in the Messiah. One doesn’t even need to know ancient history to be amazed at this prophecy; simply read an Israeli newspaper (or see this list of political parties in Israel).

How does one respond to such a turn of events?  It seems that a Pauline doxology (e.g., Rom 11:33-36) would be quite appropriate.  Isaiah, however, provides his own.  He predicts just what Israel will declare “on that day.”  This song of rejoicing is the sole content of Isaiah 12.  The people rejoice in God, their salvation.  They exult in his glorious deeds, and declare to all the earth his forgiving love.  Isaiah (and other prophets) will later explain how this will happen, for it is not obvious from what we ‘ve read thus far how the hearts of the people will be changed.

But, there’s one more thing.  If you ‘re reading this closely, as Isaiah expected his readers to, they might see something astonishing in the last phrase of the song.

Isaiah 12:6 (ESV) “Shout, and sing for joy, O inhabitant of Zion, for great in your midst is the Holy One of Israel.”

Who is the one in the midst of the people?  The Holy One of Israel is the special name that Isaiah uses for God.  It is remarkable that a passage that begins speaking about the Son of David ruling in the midst of the people ends by saying that the Holy One of Israel is among them.  Perhaps the original readers would not have equated the ruler with God.  But perhaps some of them would have been wondering, given that the ruler has already been called “God with us” (Immanuel) and “Mighty God” (cf. Isa 2:4-5).  Certainly it is there for later readers who understand that Jesus is the Holy One of Israel.

Are we in the kingdom now?  Only if you deny the fulfillment of nearly every verse in this passage.  Is Isaiah trying to describe some existence in another world or in the eternal state?  Only if everything in this passage is taken metaphorically.  A better conclusion that keeps with the context of the whole of Isaiah (as well as with the whole Bible) is that this messianic kingdom is the earthly fulfillment of the promises made to Israel.  They have not been abrogated, and they are not being fulfilled “in a better way” in some spiritual reality in the church.  For all of the blessings the church now enjoys, the promise of an earthly kingdom of righteousness with King Jesus on the throne still awaits.  We should pray, as Jesus taught us, “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven” (Matt 6:10).  One day he will answer our prayers.

“I am the soldier who slept in your home”

By | January 30, 2009

An Israeli reserve soldier who served in the recent attack on Gaza wrote a letter to the people whose house he stayed in.

Hello,

While the world watches the ruins in Gaza, you return to your home which remains standing. However, I am sure that it is clear to you that someone was in your home while you were away.

I am that someone.

I spent long hours imagining how you would react when you walked into your home. How you would feel when you understood that IDF soldiers had slept on your mattresses and used your blankets to keep warm.

I knew that it would make you angry and sad and that you would feel this violation of the most intimate areas of your life by those defined as your enemies, with stinging humiliation. I am convinced that you hate me with unbridled hatred, and you do not have even the tiniest desire to hear what I have to say. At the same time, it is important for me to say the following in the hope that there is even the minutest chance that you will hear me.

I spent many days in your home. You and your family’s presence was felt in every corner. I saw your family portraits on the wall, and I thought of my family. I saw your wife’s perfume bottles on the bureau, and I thought of my wife. I saw your children’s toys and their English language schoolbooks. I saw your personal computer and how you set up the modem and wireless phone next to the screen, just as I do.

I wanted you to know that despite the immense disorder you found in your house that was created during a search for explosives and tunnels (which were indeed found in other homes), we did our best to treat your possessions with respect. When I moved the computer table, I disconnected the cables and lay them down neatly on the floor, as I would do with my own computer. I even covered the computer from dust with a piece of cloth. I tried to put back the clothes that fell when we moved the closet although not the same as you would have done, but at least in such a way that nothing would get lost.

The rest of the letter is here.

The Gods of the Ancient Near East

By | January 29, 2009

I’m reading a book right now about the “Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible.”  The main title of this work by John Walton is Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament.  This post is not a recommendation, as I have only read about 100 pages so far.  But there were a few statements in the chapter on “The Gods” that I thought might be of interest here.

“There is no such word as ‘religion ‘ in the languages of the ancient Near East.  Likewise, there is no dichotomy between sacred and secular, or even between natural and supernatural. . . . Life was religion and religion could not be compartmentalized within life” (p. 87).

“The operative question in their minds, for instance, is not, ‘Is deity just? ‘ but, ‘Does the deity administer justice? ‘  It is not important whether the deity is inherently good—is the deity doing good for me?” (p. 106).

“It is very rare for the gods of the ancient Near East to be described as good, though the hope is commonly expressed that the god will do good to the worshiper, that is, act favorably or for their benefit” (p. 109).

“Faithfulness is one of the most frequently affirmed attributes of Yahweh because of his covenant relationship with Israel.  In contrast, it is difficult to find any such affirmation for the gods of the ancient Near East.  Words that convey loyalty are never used of gods in that way.  The gods have no agreements or promises to be faithful to and no obligations or commitments to fulfill” (p. 109).

M. Dandamayev: “Dogmatism and intolerance toward the beliefs of others was alien to the ancient religions, since the complete absence of the concept of false faith or of any forms of heresy were typical of them” (p. 111).

Prophetic Perfects, Photographs, and a Pilot

By | January 28, 2009

Dr. Bookman is challenging sacred cows in his questioning of the already/not yet construct.

The Blue Angels go low in the SF Bay.

I thought this article was interesting: All I want to do is Zoom Zoom Zoom Zoom: Microsoft’s Photosynth, the best thing to happen to photography since the digital camera.

Car lands on church roof.

You can get a free Russian Bible for your Logos Bible Software.

How long of a landing strip do you need?  Not much for this Super Cub pilot!

I hope to continue with Isaiah 11 in a few days.

Gaza, Greek, and Carbon 14

By | January 26, 2009

A trustworthy friend who once lived in Gaza highly recommends this WSJ article on the background of the situation there.

The Terrorism Awareness Project has an 8-minute animated slideshow that gives the background of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

If you ‘re suspicious of Carbon 14 dating, this brief article might be of interest.

I don’t live in California, but if I did and I wasn’t part of a college, I’d definitely be interested in this news from a California librarian:  A California resident can obtain a free ecard from the San Francisco Public Library from the comfort of one’s own home or office.  Simply fill out the ecard application and gain immediate access to all of SFPL’s online resources, including JSTOR.  The card is good for four years and it is only necessary to show up in person if one wants an upgrade to circulation privileges.

If you know Hebrew and/or Greek and you teach and/or preach, Bill Mounce has some words of wisdom you should consider.