Life of Christ books

By | August 27, 2006

I have found a good deal on 6 classic books on the life of Christ, for about $2.50 a book. The catch? 1) They’re for the computer, in Logos/Libronix format. 2) They haven’t quite been published yet. But that’s the reason for this post.

Logos will publish these 6 books in a collection if there is enough interest. It’s been available for bidders oldbook.giffor a year now, I’d guess, but right now it’s near its tipping point, and maybe we can push it over into production. These books are classics, and I just found more evidence of that when I went looking through my Life of Christ syllabus. Some years ago when I taught that class, I asked the world’s expert on the life of Christ for his brief thoughts on important books on the subject. He commented on all four of the below authors. Here’s a list of the books, and what Doug Bookman said about each.

F. W. Farrar, Life of Christ, published 1874, 744 pages.

F. W. Farrar, The Life of Lives (Further Studies in the Life of Christ), published 1900, 461 pages.

Of both volumes: Farrar was a devotee of liberal ideas (denied eternal punishment, suggested Darwin be buried in Westminster Abbey, etc.), and some of those ideas show up in the book. But it is nonetheless a helpful tome. Some good insights into the possible motives behind some of Jesus’s actions.

James Stalker, The Life of Christ, published 1882, 166 pages.

Mostly devotional, and follows the classic breakdown of chronology and emphasis (which I regard as somewhat flawed). But very readable, some helpful insights.

James Stalker, The Trial and Death of Jesus Christ, published 1894, 185 pages.

Samuel Andrews, The Life of Our Lord Upon the Earth, published 1889, 624 pages.

Excellent study, very devotional, well said. I haven’t used Andrews as much as I have others, have always found him to be tremendously helpful.

G. Campbell Morgan, The Crises of the Christ, published 1903, pages 477.

Focuses on 7 specific incidents in Jesus’ life/ministry: birth, baptism, temptation, transfiguration, crucifixion, resurrection, ascension. Written in heavy prose, but worth slugging through. The sections can be read individually, which makes it good for research.

So, as I was saying, go here right now and place a bid at $15 (just click on $15). If enough people do, Logos will publish it and you will have a lot of reading to do. Yes, you could go and buy them online used, but the cost for shipping the 6 books would be more than the $15. Many of these are available used pretty inexpensively ($3-10), but the cheapest Andrews book available is $25.

In other words, you can’t lose. Unless, of course, you never read or reference them. In which case, send your $15 in to the IBEX scholarship fund!

UPDATE (9/3): A friend has found Farrar’s Life of Christ for free.   I still think it’s worth $15 to get all 6 books and in the easy-to-use Logos format.

Book Tag, The Right Way

By | August 25, 2006

Now I’ve read some of the others who have answered these questions, and frankly, either they are really smart or I’m just the opposite.   But without pretense, here are my honest answers, as best as I can determine with my imperfect memory.

1. One book that changed your life: The Student Map Manual.

2. One book that you’ve read more than once: Albert Camus, The Plague (horrible book; I was trying to get an A); by choice?   C. J. Mahaney, Humility: True Greatness.

3. One book you ‘d want on a desert island: C.S. Lewis, Essay Collection and Other Short Pieces  (hard to find!, but some used here)

4. One book that made you laugh: Prince Caspian, by C. S. Lewis (I’m reading this to the boys now)

5. One book that made you cry: A Severe Mercy, by Sheldon Vanauken

6. One book you wish had been written: The Life of Christ, by Douglas Bookman; The Archaeology of Jerusalem, by Gabriel Barkay

7. One book you wish had never been written: Albert Camus, The Plague; The Quran.

8. One book you ‘re currently reading: Jerusalem: Portrait of the City in the Second Temple Period, by Lee Levine.

9. One book you’ve been meaning to read: John Owen on the Christian Life, by Sinclair Ferguson.

I’m supposed to tag someone, but like Jonathan, I refuse.   However, I wouldn’t mind hearing from Eric, the rapper known as Gunner, or Sam.   Or Steve.

Tips for Teachers

By | August 24, 2006

Scot McKnight has an interesting series of posts going on education this past week, all of which I would like to interact with here.   Maybe one at a time.   Perhaps this will be beneficial to any aspiring teachers who read this blog.   I’ll start with today’s – his letter to a new professor.   I don’t have the experience that he has, but I agree with most of his 20 points.

It would be shorter to note points of disagreement, so I’ll do that.

Well, this is hard.   The first ten are great!   But on #11, I disagree.   I don’t think teachers are ready to write a book after only 3-4 years.   And the world certainly doesn’t need whatever book they produce.   There are exceptions to this rule.   These first years are also important for developing in the classroom, and I think that a writing project could easily divert one’s attention for building teaching skills, lectures, and yes, even PowerPoint presentations.

On #13 second sentence, I could lose some friends for life, so I probably should demur quietly.   I just think there are so many problems with professional sports and so many other ways of redeeming the time (and relaxing), that I simply cannot agree.

#14 sounds kind of strange to me.   It’s like he’s talking to an outsider to the church, not a fully engaged member.   I think teachers should have a regular role of ministry in their church, and not be waiting around for invitations.

#18 – at least one!

Ok, so my comments aren’t so helpful on this one, but if it gets the aspiring teacher to read his, this post is worth it.   I’ll have more to disagree with on others, especially his PowerPoint and computer posts. Ugh!

My News Fix

By | August 23, 2006

I don’t know how you get your daily news wrap-up, but I don’t get mine from either television or radio. The Internet is much faster (that is, I can read faster than watch/listen). There’s a ton of sites out there but what I just realized I have been reading for about 10 years(!) is Today’s Papers from Slate.

This is a free daily summary of the major stories in the top 5 U.S. newspapers (NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, LA Times, and USA Today). It has links to the stories (which I rarely follow), but basically ensures that I am up on the latest national and international stories. It has a liberal flavor but is usually honest. I get it by email subscription, which makes it easier to keep up with.

Are You Sure You Want To Ask That?

By | August 22, 2006

I’ve heard teachers say that there’s no such thing as a “stupid question,” but those must have never been in my classroom (or on my bus).   Dr. Randy Stinson, dean of the Leadership School at Southern Seminary, has come up with a solution.   Pass this out on the first day of class and you’re set!   (Honestly, stupid questions bothered me more as a student than as a teacher.)
HT: Fill Up

What Israelis Think about the War

By | August 20, 2006

MAARIV POLL–August 15, 2006
Telephone poll of a representative sample of 500 adult Israelis carried out by Teleseker. Statistical error +/- 4.4 percentage points.

Who do you think won the war? Hizbullah 15%, Israel 18%, No one 66%
Should Israel have agreed to the cease-fire? Yes 42%, No 53%
Will Israel’s situation vis-a-vis Hizbullah change? Improve 36%, Worsen 27%, No change 33%

Who do you think bears the responsibility for the failures found during the course of the fighting?
Chief of Staff Halutz 40%
Defense Minister Peretz 41%
Prime Minister Olmert 49%
Northern Commander Adam 18%
Nothing went wrong in the war 3%

Should the IDF have entered on the ground in Southern Lebanon? Yes 62%, No 32%
Should Israel kill Nasrallah, even at the cost of renewing the fighting? Yes 67%, No 28%
Should Israel bomb the Iranian nuclear core? Yes 63%, No 30%

Percent satisfied with the performance of:
Prime Minister Olmert, 40%,
Defense Minister Peretz, 28%
Chief Of Staff Dan Halutz, Satisfied 44%, Not satisfied 52%
IDF, Satisfied 81%, No satisfied 18%

Poll: YEDIOT AHRONOT–August 15, 2006
Telephone poll of a representative sample of 500 adult Israelis carried out by Dahaf. (Statistical error +/- 4.5 percentage points).

How do you rate the performance of the following during the war?
Prime Minister Olmert – Good 47%, Bad 51%
Minister of Defense Peretz – Good 36%, Bad 63%
Chief of Staff (COS) Dan Halutz – Good 49%, Bad 47%
Heads of IDF – Good 61%, Bad 32%
Government – Good 14%, Bad 84%
Soldiers and commanders – Good 94%, Bad 3%

Should the following resign from their positions?
Prime Minister Olmert – Yes 41%, No 56%
Minister of Defense Peretz – Yes 57%, No 41%
COS Dan Halutz – Yes 42%, No 54%

Should Israel have agreed to the cease-fire without the return of the soldiers taken hostage? Yes 27%, No 70%

Who won the war? Hizbullah 30%, Israel 30%, Neither 36%

Source: Israel Current News Update, Bridges for Peace

I'm Proud of This

By | August 20, 2006

The Master’s College has been ranked 2nd (tied) in the West (in the top tier) as one of America’s Best Colleges 2007 in the Best Comprehensive Colleges-Bachelor’s category by U.S. News and World Report. This marks the 7th year in a row that TMC was listed in the top tier of western region bachelor’s degree colleges. The publication also cites The Master’s College as one of the best values ranking in the top 10 in the West in the section entitled Great Schools, Great Prices. (TMC press release, August 18, 2006)

TMC is a great school and we don’t need an external study to tell us that, though when we get one, we’ll take it. The school is not perfect, but God’s hand of blessing is very evident in so many areas.

Sidenote: There may not be another person in the world more disturbed by the cost of tuition at TMC than me, but I think it is important to note that relative to others, TMC is a good deal.

Peace, Peace

By | August 20, 2006

A missionary who lives in Beirut said something that I think summarizes the “results” of the war. I don’t have permission to quote him, so I will summarize: Attitudes in Lebanon are much more polarized than before, but the issues which precipitated the war have not been resolved. Now me: The first part means that more people in Lebanon hate Israel more than ever before. The second part means that there will be another war. To say it another way, those who demanded an immediate ceasefire will get a “short-term peace,” the cost of which will be greater than the recent war. Today’s “quiet” is a false peace, a premature peace.

Here’s an article about who won the war that I essentially agree with, by a former CIA station chief.